Award Winners
September 22, 2005
There's still a little more than a week left in the season, but I
thought I'd take a swing at the guessing who the post-season winners
will be and who I believe should be.
Barry Bonds will win the MVP in the National League... what? he's
only been playing for a week? Well, you couldn't tell from the
amount
of fawning over him that's been going on in the media. About the
only time he doesn't get obsequiously praised is when he sits out a day
game after a night game. Then, for some reason, he becomes a
villain for not helping his team out in the pennant race. Correct
me if I'm wrong, but the Giants are 5 games out with 10 games
left. That doesn't really qualify as being in a pennant race,
especially since
Gene
Mauch isn't around any more. As for Bonds, he isn't the first
great player who put himself before the team.
But I digress... I'm supposed to be talking about this year's
MVPs. The candidates in the NL are Andruw Jones, Albert Pujols
and Derrek Lee. Lee and Pujols are #1 and #2 in batting average,
Jones is the league leader in homers and RBI. Lee is #2 in
homers, Pujols #3 and they are #7 and #6 in RBI behind Jones.
Pujols and Lee are
#2 and #4 in on base and #s 2 and 1 respectively in slugging with Jones
4th. Voters gravitate to players on teams that make the
playoffs so the likely result will be between Pujols and Jones.
But what is "most valuable"?
My definition of most valuable is the player who was most indispensable
but also in an objective sense, most productive. So if a guy like
Alex
Rodriguez is by far and away the most productive player in the league
as he was in 2002, I don't care that he was on a bad team. He
still should win the MVP. Miguel Tejada won the award that year,
and after seeing him play regularly the last couple of years I can see
why writers voted the award for him. But seriously - how bad
would the 103-win A's
have been without him? Isn't it probable that they would have
made the playoffs on the strength of Barry Zito, Mark Mulder, Tim
Hudson, Eric Chavez and a productive Jermaine Dye? How bad would
the Rangers have been without ARod? Would they have won 60 games
without him with a rotation of Kenny Rogers, Chan Ho Park, Ismael
Valdes, Dave Burba and Rob Bell? Hideki Irabu led the team in
saves for crying out loud. Herbert Perry was their 4th most
productive hitter. They got a total of 44 home runs and 188 RBI
from their
top four outfielders and their DH combined in a hitter's park.
That averages to 9 homers and 38 RBI from what are usually a team's
most productive positions. This was a truly awful team, yet still
managed to win 72 games in no
small part because ARod was awesome that year. So yes, it's
acceptable for an MVP to come from a last place team. And while I
don't count against a player on good team for having good teammates,
they should figure into the equation as to why his team is good.
Derrek Lee has gotten little or no help this season and as a result,
the Cubs are a long ways from being good. Albert Pujols has had a
comparable year to Lee, and even though Scott Rolen has been injured
for much of the season, can one really discount the contributions of
Chris Carpenter, Matt Morris, Mark Mulder and Jim Edmonds to the
Cardinals' success? More to the point, would the Cubs be in the
playoff hunt if they had a healthy Mark Prior and Kerry Wood all
year? Is that a trick question? A more interesting question
to ponder is would the Cubs be in contention if Dusty Baker weren't
their manager?
Andruw Jones hasn't had the year the other
two have in terms of on base and slugging, but I don't believe anyone
outside of
David Ortiz has more game-changing or game-deciding hits this season
than Jones. And who exactly have been Andruw Jones' partners in
crime this season? Chipper Jones has been sidelined by
injuries. Marcus Giles and Rafael Furcal have been decent but
the rest of the offense has been largely made up of rookies. The
only
constant in the rotation has been John Smoltz. If there's a
player who's team is winning because of him and wouldn't be winning
without him, it's probably Jones. Throw in that he plays a more
demanding defensive position than Lee or Pujols and he plays it better
than anyone else in the league and the guy I'd vote for is Jones.
I wouldn't say the margin is significant and I won't disagree with the
strong arguments for the other two players nor would I say the vote is
final because with a little more than a week to go in the season there
is plenty of baseball left for one guy to get hot enough to change my
mind. But for me right now the choice is
Jones.
In the AL, the choice is between David Ortiz and ARod. Both
players enjoy ample supporting casts so the team context is moot.
I don't think anyone has had more game-winning or dramatic hits than
Ortiz this season. Is it me or does it seem like just about every
game the Red Sox
win, it's Ortiz delivering the margin of victory? But he doesn't
play
the field. Since his overall offensive numbers aren't that
different from ARod's, the guy who also plays defense everyday - and
plays it very well - gets the edge over Ortiz' dramatics.
I can see the argument for Roger Clemens as the NL Cy Young winner and
I'm
not a particularly big fan of wins as a significant factor in who gets
the award, but Chris Carpenter should get the hardware. He's
pitched 26 more innings than Clemens; that's nearly 3 complete games
worth. Lesser pitchers (almost by definition) have to pitch those
innings for the Astros when Clemens is out thus giving the opposition a
better
chance to win the game. For me, the Cy Young winner should be the
guy who
gave the opposition the least opportunity to win, and this year that
guy is Carpenter. He's tied for the league lead in complete
games, second in shut-outs and second to Clemens in ERA. The
league leading wins total is just icing on the cake.
In the AL, it's a similar story. Bartolo Colon
leads the league in wins while Johan Santana
leads in WHIP and strikeouts and has a good chance to finish the season
first in ERA. Santana is still the AL's best
pitcher, but unfortunately he hasn't gotten much run support from the
Twins. To give you an idea of how good he's been, since the
All-Star Break he has a 1.64 ERA and a 0.86 WHIP. That's not too
far off from what he did last year when he ran away with the Cy Young
award: 1.21 ERA, 0.75 WHIP. The biggest difference between this
year and last for Santana is that he's only gone 7-2 as opposed to 13-0
in the second half. But Colon is the guy who will win. Not
only does he lead the league in wins (and as far as the voters are
concerned six more than Santana), but he's also second in WHIP and 4th
in ERA. Plus there isn't a great difference in the innings
pitched between them. That should be good enough for the hardware.
The talk of the manager of the year races in the NL revolve around
Bobby Cox and Tony LaRussa. But has anyone considered how much
the Nationals have achieved? This is a team that won 67 games
last year yet they stayed in the playoff race this year until the final
two weeks of the season. I'm not saying that Frank Robinson
should win; only that the discussion should include more than the two
managers most often mentioned. How about the job Phil Garner has
done in Houston keeping them in the playoff race despite as dismal
start and the offseason losses of Carlos Beltran and Jeff Kent?
Or the job that Ned Yost has done in Milwaukee? That the Brewers
are in 3rd in the NL Central and looking like a real contender for the
division crown next year is a testament to the terrific job he and his
staff have done.
But the guy I'd vote for is Bruce Bochy. Yeah, the NL West has
been weak, but consider that the Padres lost their #2 starter (Adam
Eaton) for two months, their leading hitter (Mark Loretta) from last
year as well as their starting catcher (Ramon Hernandez) for two months
each, their starting shortstop (Khalil Greene) for a month and have had
been so desperate to find starting pitching for the bottom of their
rotation that they actually traded for Chan Ho Park. It's highly
likely that only one player (Brian Giles) will finish with more than
450 at bats. The #3 and #4 highest win totals on the pitching
staff are owned by relievers. Their record isn't impressive
especially for a team bound for the post-season but someone had to win
the West and Bochy did an excellent job of guiding his team through
adversity and making sure that it was the Padres.
In the AL, there's no question that the AL Manager of the Year has to
be Buddy Bell. But seriously, the award will probably go to Eric
Wedge because of Cleveland's historic second half charge.
Still, one has to wonder how much of their success is due to the
schedule. They finished most of the their games against the
Yankees, Red Sox, Angels and A's in the first half, affording them a
schedule replete with Tampa and Kansas City in the second half.
The White Sox had the just opposite. So it's shouldn't be that
surprising that the two teams' records converged in the second
half. The surprise is by how much they've closed. The
alternative to Wedge would
probably be Ozzie Guillen, but if his team doesn't win the Central
after leading the division by 15 games at the beginning of August, or
worse misses the playoffs, then there's no way he can win.
Two other options, and I think stronger choices are Ken Macha in
Oakland and Mike Scioscia in LA. Scioscia has managed to lead the
AL West despite losing Vlad Guerrero for a month and Kelvim Escobar for
most of the season. However, little was expected of the A's this
season after the offseason losses of Mulder, Hudson and Dye and even
less
when new staff ace Rich Harden was sidelined with injuries, yet the A's
are contending for the playoffs with a pretty young team. In
addition, the A's have been in contention despite a woeful start to the
season, injuries to Bobby Crosby and Mark Kotsay and a season from
Jason Kendall in which he has yet to hit a home run. Three of the
A's starters began the season with fewer than 10 career major league
starts. That this team is contending at all is pretty
impressive. My vote
would go to Macha even if the A's miss out on the playoffs.