Argh, Matey!
September 19, 2006
Avast, me hearties - today be National
Talk Like a Pirate Day.
Noboby knows the exact date when people started talking like
Robert Newton,
but there be the possibility that it were a September 19th of
yore. Or maybe the holiday it be like
Christmas, a date
chosen for political purposes. Regardless,
there be far sillier things afoot and if ye don't mind me gettin' outta
me pirate gear, I'll parley a dubloon for yer time.
In baseball, the silliest thing going is Derek Jeter's candidacy for
the AL MVP. It's pretty funny that when the sportswriters can't
show that a player is good with his numbers, they resort to talking
about how much he drives the team in the clubhouse. And that
might very well be true with Jeter. But even if the Yankees were
lackidaisical, does anyone actually believe that a team of All-Stars
(former and present) with a team salary of over $200 million, who added
another $16 million outfielder at the trade deadline, that that team
wouldn't win 90 games? So how much of their success is due to
Jeter and how much is due to the Yankees paying for a top 5 player at
every position?
OK, let's look at the numbers. I know numbers don't tell the
whole story, but they at least have to tell some of it, don't
they? Jeter
currently has the fourth highest OPS... on the Yankees, behind Jason
Giambi, Alex Rodriguez and Bobby Abreu. He's not even the MVP on
his own team. If we exclude all Yankee players, he has the
second highest OPS... among AL shortstops, behind Carlos Guillen.
He's 16th overall in the AL.
Every
single player considered his
competition for the award is more productive at the plate: David Ortiz
(3rd in OPS),
Jermaine Dye (4th), Jim Thome (5th), Justin Morneau (7th), Frank Thomas
(8th), Joe Mauer (10th), Grady Sizemore (12th) and Carlos Guillen
(14th). One really has to stretch the statistics to find
meaningful foundation
for an MVP candidacy.
VORP (value over replacement player) is often cited as his strongest
argument but given that the Yanks removed his biggest competition at
short by putting ARod at third,
comparing Jeter to the rest of the field is selling the field
short. Jeter's VORP rating would take a huge hit if ARod were on
a different team. At best, Jeter is an average
fielding shortstop and by many accounts he's one of the worst
range-wise.
There aren't any defensive metrics that reveal how many runs a player
actually saves with his glove so it's not like we can do simple math to
determine what his actual runs value is. And since shortstop is
one of the weaker hitting positions, any shortstop who is remotely
productive offensively gains a huge advantage in VORP. What would
Justin Morneau's VORP be if the Twins moved him to short? His
defensive value couldn't be much more limited than Jeter's. It's
obvious that Jeter's VORP is artificially high.
When it comes to the argument concerning which guy has done the most to
help his team, Jeter's candidacy utterly fails the smell test
here. The
science is in: the Yankees have a TON of very good players and Jeter,
although he's the acknowledged leader of the team, is less valuable
than most of them. ARod, Giambi, Abreu are all better
at the plate than Jeter and only Giambi is worse in the field.
Johnny Damon, Jorge Posada and Robinson Cano are all much better in the
field than Jeter and pretty close to being as productive at the
plate. In a healthy year, one could add Hideki Matsui to that
list of players who are arguably more valuable. Lest we forget,
Mariano Rivera, Chien-MingWang and Mike Mussina have been very good as
well. And Randy Johnson is a pretty decent throw-in to the
argument that Jeter has lots and lots of help this year.
The Yankees are 42-24 (.636) since the All-Star Break, after starting
the year 50-36 (.581). Their pitching has actually been worse as
the year has progressed (4.30 ERA before, 4.53 ERA after the
Break). Jeter has been slightly better, increasing his OPS from
.888 to .906 despite an drop in on base of almost 30 points. But
the biggest reason the Yankees are where they are right now is the
addition of Bobby Abreu, whose .921 OPS replaced the .557 of Bubba
Crosby in the line-up. He's the MVP of the Yankees in the second
half. Jeter's performance has had little impact on the improved
fortunes of the Yankees yet he's getting all the credit.
Carlos Guillen's Tigers have no players with 30 or more home runs (the
Yanks have 2), only one player with a realistic chance at 100 RBI
(Magglio Ordonez) while the Yanks will finish with four, and Detroit's
closer is Todd Jones. No one picked the Tigers to make the
playoffs this year and certainly no one thought they would have the
best record in baseball for nearly 90% of the season, yet there they
are. If the question is which shortstop is making his team
a contender despite getting little help, then the answer is obviously
Carlos Guillen, NOT Derek Jeter. And Guillen is a better gloveman
than Jeter to boot.
The Twins also have a pretty solid team. Nick Punto has been an
important
part of their resurgence, getting on base and playing solid defense at
third, but he's hardly Alex Rodriguez. The big guns on the Twins
have been Mauer,
Morneau, Johan Santana, Francisco Liriano, Joe Nathan and Michael
Cuddyer. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that also looks like a much
shorter list than what has helped Jeter this year.
Joe Mauer has a higher batting average, on base and slugging than
Jeter, he carried the Twins in May and early June before Morneau,
Santana and Cuddyer caught fire and has a very good chance to become
the
first AL catcher to win a batting title. He also plays a more
physically demanding and strategically more important position.
His VORP is dragged down
because of the presence of Victor Martinez, Jorge Posada and Ramon
Hernandez. Only one regular AL catcher has an OPS below .740
(Jason Kendall), while four AL shortstops do. Using VORP to
assess MVP value is not any more useful than using the triple crown
categories and in this case is probably less useful.
Justin Morneau might be an even better candidate than Mauer. He's
hit
.375 over the last four months and no one in the AL has more RBI over
that span. Regardless, he's just 5 back of David Ortiz for the AL
overall lead. He's had two months where he's batted over .400 and
two
in which he's slugged better than .700. He has a decent
chance to finish in the top 5 in the triple-crown categories and has a
better than good chance to lead the Twins into the playoffs as the AL
Central champ despite being more than 10 games back a couple of months
ago. Arrr, matey, that be looking like yer true MVP.
If the voters are not going to give the MVP award to some guy with 40
homers, there just isn't any reasonable justification to give it to
Derek Jeter. There are two superior candidates at key defensive
positions on winning teams who are putting up better individual numbers
than
Jeter and there are several power hitters - Morneau, David
Ortiz, Jermaine Dye, Frank Thomas - who are having MVP worthy
campaigns. Jeter's MVP credentials this season, arrr, they be
nothing but
blarney.
But let me take it a step further.
I
believe Derek Jeter is perhaps the single most over-rated player in the
history of baseball. I do think he's a very good player but he
has an awful lot of hype surrounding his performance and the numbers
indicate that I'm not just
having an allergic reaction to his media machine. He is the only
player in
history to force two 40 homer/40 steal players (both shortstops, no
less) to switch positions entirely due to pride and
self-centeredness. Alfonso Soriano played shortstop in the minors
but was moved to second
to accomdate Jeter and of course ARod's switch. There's little
question that with his limited range and strong arm Jeter would be fine
at third base, while ARod's superior range would help the team's
groundballers considerably. Jeter is far better moving forward
and back than he is laterally which makes moving him to third all the
more obvious. It's hilarious to
listen to people prattle on about how Mike Piazza should be moved from
catcher because of defensive shortcomings yet insist that Jeter be kept
at short despite his. With Piazza, we're talking about the best
hitting catcher in history. With Jeter, we're talking about a guy
who has averaged 2.44 home runs per 100 plate appearances, which among
shortstops ranks - are you ready for this? - 26th all time, just ahead
of Orlando Miller and Roy Smalley but just behind Tom Tresh and Dale
Sveum.
Even though defensive metrics still have a long way to go, most of them
point to the fact that Jeter has subpar range. I think the Dewan
Fielding Bible comes closest to
reconciling pure numbers with what the scouts see (although there's
still a way to go before the two meet) and according to it
Jeter is well below average with the glove. If I remember
correctly, it
was pretty much unanimous that when ARod arrived in New York that he
was
the better defensive player, and that the only reason Jeter
wasn't moved was because of his own obstinance to recognize ARod as the
better
player. The press came to Jeter's defense by stating that the
Yankees
had won four World Championships with Jeter at short so how bad could
he
be? But the fact is that as long as the Yankees had Mariano
Rivera,
Roger Clemens, David Cone, David Wells, Andy Pettitte, Wade Boggs, Paul
O'Neill, Bernie Williams, Jorge Posada, Tino Martinez, Darryl
Strawberry, Tim Raines and
a host above average regulars, relievers and bench players, they
probably could have won at least two championships with a glove
at the shortstop position. Not an actual player, just his glove.
Nevertheless, let's look at where Jeter is right now. He's 32 years old
and entering this season he had 1936 hits, 169 homers, 215 steals
and a .314/.386/.461 batting line. Miguel Tejada, by comparison,
is two
years younger, had 1370 hits entering this season, 216 homers, 58
steals and
a .280/.338/.477 line. No one will debate that he's the much
better gloveman. I would compare ARod to Jeter but a) he
hasn't been a shortstop for the last two years and b) there is no
comparison because Rodriguez exceeded Jeter in every facet of the
game when he was playing there.
It's interesting to note that only Cal Ripken had more hits as a
shortstop at this point in his career than Jeter. Of course,
that's still no guarantee that he'll finish with at least 3000
hits. For example, even though he was
a second baseman, Roberto Alomar had more hits than any middle
infielder in history at age 32 with 2196, along with 151
homers, 377 steals and a .304/.375/.446 batting line. He was
almost a
certain
lock for more than 3000 career hits, yet he fell short by 276.
Steve Sax had roughly the same number of hits (1915) that
Jeter did at this point in his career; he finished with
1949. Alan
Trammell had 1929 hits at this point and he might not nake the Hall of
Fame with his career total of 2365 hits. Dick Bartell and Garry
Templeton are also in the top 10 shortstops at this point in their
careers with regard to hits yet they are in no danger of making the
Hall.
Taking this point one step further, there are a number of guys with
more hits that
Jeter to this point in their careers who didn't finish with 3000 hits:
Rogers Hornsby,
Vada Pinson, Willie Keeler, Joe Medwick, Jimmie Foxx, Sam Crawford,
Jesse Burkett, Richie Ashburn, Frankie Frisch, Al Simmons, Ed
Delahanty, Harry Heilmann, Lloyd Waner, Goose Goslin, Stuffy McInnis,
Lou Gehrig, Heinie Manush, Nellie Fox, Roberto Alomar, Orlando Cepeda,
Arky Vaughn, Pie Traynor, Ron Santo, George Davis, Rusty Staub, Mickey
Mantle, Sherry Magee, Billy Herman, Joe Torre, Jake Beckley, Kirby
Puckett, Buddy Bell, Joe Kelly, Jim Rice, Del Ennis, Eddie Matthews,
Joe Sewell and Ryne Sandberg. If you're counting, that's
nearly 40 guys who had more hits at the same age as Jeter entering this
year yet still didn't top 3000 hits. And many of those guys were much better hitters than
Jeter. There are nearly 60 guys in
history who had more hits. Doing the math,
Jeter has roughly a 33% chance of topping 3000. I'd
call that far from a lock. Five or six years ago there were a lot
of people telling me that Bernie Williams had a really good chance for
3000 hits. Maybe I'm wrong here but unless he has a couple of
300-hit seasons in his bat, I think he's going to fall well
short.
If we use OPS as a measure, Jeter ranks 82nd at this age. Of the
guys who aren't currently playing, only a few aren't in the Hall of
Fame and most of those have legitimate claims for enshrinement.
Using runs created, Jeter ranks 8th among shortstops to this point in
his career. Of course, four of the guys ahead of him - Ed McKean,
Bill Dahlen, Jack Glasscock and Herman Long - are guys few people have
heard of. And the guy who has the highest runs created for a
shortstop for a career before age 32? That would be Alex
Rodriguez. But let's pull out all the stops. Among
shortstops (and only shortstops) with at least 1000 plate appearances,
he ranks 32nd all-time in isolated power behind Kevin Elster, Wil
Cordero and Chris Woodward. He ranks 29th in secondary average,
19th in total bases and 16th in runs created per game. Again,
this is just among shortstops all-time, a position that has notoriously
been the refuge of all-glove, no-hit type players. For a guy
who's calling card is supposed to be offense (because it sure ain't his
glove) those numbers are pretty underwhelming. And as he gets
older, the rate numbers are unlikely to get any better. He's
essentially Tony Gwynn with less average and fewer steals. Gwynn
had 8 batting titles; Jeter has zero. So again tell me why he's
supposed to be so great?
For every player there are two sides of his story: what he does on
offense, which is reasonably well related in the numbers, and what he
does on defense which, until someone starts using computerized video
analysis to reveal exactly how quickly and how far players travel to
get to a ball in play, will be under the perview of personal
observation with some kibutzing from a few stats. In Jeter's
case, he's a very good hitter and at best adequate in the field.
So how does someone do the math and get "great" from that?
Jeter will probably end up in the Hall of Fame regardless of what
happens from here on out largely because the New York media push for
him is so
strong. I mean, Phil Rizzuto is in the Hall as a player for
heaven's sake. Whether or not he will actually deserve it is a
different matter. There is plenty left to be decided
about his career and what he's done so far, while very good, is far
from
assurance that he will end up among the pantheon of baseball's greatest
players. An MVP will help, although I'm not sure stealing one is
the way to go about it... but then again, maybe the people pushing for
Jeter are less Yankee fans than they are pirates at heart.