Prospecting
August 14, 2006
Probably the biggest attraction in keeper leagues is prospecting for
major league talent in the minors. In leagues where there are few
restrictions and large reserve lists, I've seen guys draft kids from
the little league World Series. No lie. In my first keeper
league, one of the guys picked up then 12-year old Sean Burroughs after
his phenomenal debut performance that included a couple no-hitters in
the Williamsport Classic. He
dropped him a few years later after Burroughs switched from pitcher to
third base in college, but that's beside the point. And with guys
coming from Korea and Japan with some regularity now, prospecting has
become a very efficient way to replenish a roster quickly and cheaply
under most league rules.
So I thought I'd talk about a few keepers I like for the somewhat near
future.
There has been some disappointment with Justin Upton's numbers to this
point in the season. Expectations were set pretty high after his
brother BJ performed so well in his first exposure to professional
baseball. And when Justin hit .500 and slugged .857 this spring,
well,
expectations were set that much higher. So his .267/.347/.422
line
in the low-A Midwest League, while pretty solid production for a guy
who just turned 19, has led many to question whether Upton is the real
deal or not. I still believe he is. Maybe he's not obsessed
with being a great player right now. That might still come.
But knowing how I was when I was 19, I'm guessing that after a spring
where he excelled against major league competition, that spending 5
months in East BF, Indiana isn't exactly his idea of thrilling or
particularly motivating. Imagine smoking pitch after pitch off
guys like Mark Beurhle and Greg Maddux,
household names, and then being told, "kid, you're not ready... we want
you to go up against a bunch of future grocery clerks to prove you
belong." Few 18-year olds would view that as a golden
opportunity to prove their worth. For a guy as talented as Upton,
that's almost as prison sentence. I expect next year will be our
first long glimpse at what he can really do.
I watched Edinson Volquez first two starts and I liked what I
saw. While his Triple-A numbers
weren't as impressive as Matt Garza's, he a) had a number of starts
that were statistically as impressive as any Garza put up and b) Garza
was pitching in a more pitcher friendly environment. Volquez'
last
start in Oklahoma was a 6-inning, 4 hit, 11 K outing allowing just one
unearned run. That was the 7th start in his final 13 minor league
outings in which he struck out at least 8 batters. By comparison,
Garza
struck out 8 or more in 6 of his final 13 with 8 of them coming against
Double-A competition. I'm not trying to say that
Volquez is a better pitching prospect; Garza has better control and has
pitched better overall than Volquez. However, I am saying their
talent is comparable and that if Garza has been taken in your league,
that Volquez makes a nice option #1a that could turn out just as well.
From his first start against Oakland, I liked the fact that he had
confidence in his fastball even when he struggled to locate it.
It had a lot of lateral movement; not quite as much as vintage Darren
Dreifort back in 1996-1998, but pretty close. Hopefully without
the arm problems. In the first inning, he fell behind
Jason Kendall in the count and gave up a hard smash double down the
line and it rattled him a little. He was tentative with his next
two pitches. But after a quick chat with Rod Barajas, he was
again pounding the strikezone with his fastball and over the next six
batters
he netted four groundouts and two strikeouts. He made a mistake
in the third
to Mark Ellis who put it in the seats, but again, came
back aggressively with two strikeouts to close out the inning.
The Rangers have a couple of
good guys behind the plate when it comes to keeping their starters in
games so if Volquez trusts his guys and stuff, he'll be fine.
Against the Mariners in his next start he retired the side in order
four times in seven innings and in another allowed just a cheap
single. He's the goods, folks.
I didn't get to see Garza's start against the Blue Jays, but I wouldn't
be dissuaded by it. First of all, the Blue Jays are a better
hitting team than much of what he'll be facing the rest of the
way. Second, he was clearly nervous and overthrowing. He
gave up two walks and two home runs in a little more than two innings
after surrendering just 6 homers all year and just 32 walks in 23
starts all year. Thirdly, Rick Anderson is a brilliant pitching
coach when it comes to handling young pitchers. He also is the
goods.
I still don't get what the Angels are doing with their extra
outfielders. They have a rotation of Curtis Pride, Reggie Willits
and Tommy Murphy and they don't keep any of them up long enough for the
guy to get settled. Each one will be up for about 5 days, get
about 10 at bats and then be sent down. Are they really expecting
production from these guys with the way they're being handled?
Howie Kendrick is one of the most talented minor league hitters in the
last decade and even he hit .115 for the Angels while they were jerking
him back and forth. Once they decided to give him an honest
chance to play semi-regularly he showed what he could do and hasn't
been out of the line-up since. Not that any of Murphy, Pride or
Willits are going to be difference maker players, but for crying out
loud, pick one and stick with him for at least a couple weeks before
dumping him again.
Did you know that D-backs first baseman of the present and future,
Conor Jackson, and Dodger first baseman of the future and occasionally
the present, James Loney, share the same birthday? Just like Jeff
Bagwell and Frank Thomas sharing the same birthday, so too do Jackson
and Loney: May 7. Jackson is two years older, which is one of the
reasons I like Loney's upside a little more. Jackson's minor
league numbers remind me a lot of Nick Johnson's, albeit with far fewer
hit by pitches. Another big difference is that Johnson was seeing
his first extended major league action at age 23, while Jackson's
getting his first real exposure a year later. Combined with his
superior defense, I'm pretty confident that Johnson's career will be
the better one and I don't imagine Jackson will make the argument close
with his bat. There are some
aspects of Jackson's year that are better that Johnson's rookie season
but something tells me he's
just a slightly better version of Lyle Overbay. A nice player,
but not someone to build a franchise around, real or fantasy.
I'm not sold on the imminent stardom of James Loney either, but I think
he has a better chance of becoming an impact player. Bothered by
wrist injuries the previous two years, he's made some noise this year
in Triple-A and at least held his own in the majors while Nomar has
been out. I look at his numbers in Triple-A and I can't help but
be reminded of a 22-year old at Double-A New Britain back in 1990...
some kid named Bagwell. Actually, there are a couple of other
guys who put up high average, .500+ slugging as 22-year olds with
similar playing time in Triple-A. They were even first baseman
and they did it in the hitter friendly PCL. The first was Tino
Martinez back in 1990 at Calgary. The other was Todd Helton in
1996 and 1997 in Colorado Springs. Either way, there's some
precedent in Loney's favor. Just know that it will take a
few years, probably not before he turns 26 or 27, that those power
numbers will start to show. Until then, he should at least hit
for high average.