Early Season Vent
April 23, 2006
I don't mean to beat a dead horse, honestly. But it bears
repeating that numbers don't tell the whole story about a game or a
player. Example #12,804:
On April 21, John Patterson shut down the Braves line-up.
Through seven innings he had allowed just two hits and struck out eight
with no walks. But in the eighth inning, after Jeff Francouer
fouled out, Brian McCann hit a double to center field. No biggie,
Patterson still had a 3-0 lead and he had Tony Pena, a career .247
hitter over six years in the minors just called up and already
zero-for-two in the game, coming to bat. Pena, as expected, hit
a squibby grounder to Nick Johnson for what should have been the second
out. However, Johnson made a move like he was going to take it
himself, then braincramped by changing his decision to instead toss to
Patterson. Patterson, seeing Johnson's initial move, slowed then
had to speed up to get to the bag. Johnson then lobbed the ball
about as slow as it can be tossed and still be airborne to Patterson
who got to the bag just a millisecond later than Pena. It was
ruled a base hit but it was clear that it would have been an out
without
the poor decision making on the play. What is problematic is that
it had to be ruled a hit
because mental errors and mistakes like that can't be counted as errors
due
to several reasons, not the least of which is the "reasonable effort"
stipulation. Both players made a reasonable effort to record the
out, but simply didn't get it. McCann moved up to third on
the "hit".
Back to bad decision making... the next batter, Matt Diaz hit a lazy
flyball to right field, but inexplicably Jose Guillen held on to the
ball after making the catch and did not throw home until McCann is
almost half way to the plate. The throw arrived late and up the
line so McCann easily scored, turning what should have been merely out
number
two into a run scoring sac fly. Had Guillen thrown the ball
immediately, McCann would have been forced back to third, or had he
continued to pursue his run scoring opportunity, been thrown out for an
inning-ending double play.
Still, Patterson had a 3-1 lead with two outs and Pete Orr at the
plate. Orr hit a line drive to center, but instead of playing
deep or moving to cut off the ball to the gap and hold Orr to a long
single,
center fielder Ryan Church charged and tried to make a play for it by
diving, falling
at least three feet short of intercepting it. The ball rolled to
the wall and by the time Guillen had gotten to it, Orr was on his way
to
third with a two out triple. Score: 3-2.
So Frank Robinson came to the mound thinking that Patterson was done -
even though only one of the last three balls in play should have been a
hit - and "relieved" Patterson with Mike Stanton. As you can see
by
the box score, Stanton yielded a single to the next batter, Wilson
Betimit, in short order, thus costing Patterson the lead and a
win.
The point is that Patterson got charged with three earned runs in that
inning
but had the fielders behind him played competently he would have likely
finished the eighth inning with his shutout in tact. Moreover,
two of the plays that aided in Atlanta's run scoring effort are
commonly viewed as gross mistakes that should be called errors but can
not be scored that way because of the
way the
scoring rules read. Yet they still generate numbers in the
boxscore, numbers that don't accurately reflect what occurred on the
field. And these are offensive numbers. Imagine the gaps in
reliability for defensive numbers.
In the final analysis, this won't affect the perception that Patterson
is a very good starting pitcher. However, assuming these aren't
isolated incidents Patterson's overall numbers will not accurately
reflect how good he really is. I'm not saying that the Nationals
have bad defensive players - far from it. But almost every player
has a gap in judgment every once in a while. The Nats just
happened to bunch several together that night. But think about
all the pitchers
who pitch in front of suspect defensive players or pitch to a
catcher who is predictable in his pitch selection or doesn't block
balls in the dirt very well. We don't yet have very reliable
defensive metrics, but even with all the numbers we do have there are
still fairly sizable gaps in our understanding. Is it possible
that team defense has much more effect on a pitcher's effectiveness
than the park he
pitches in? Oh yes. Even on offense, is it possible that
Roberto
Petagine's success in the minors and in Japan are illusory, that he's
really just the Quadruple A hitter the scouts have been saying he is
for all these years? I would say definitely yes, especially since
the Red Sox - a team that has embraced sabremetric evaluation - passed
on keeping him in the fold this year after having him last year.
Speaking of numbers, there are plenty of hitters getting off to lousy
starts. We don't know how many are being robbed of hits by great
defense (or lousy in the case of hard hit balls being ruled as errors)
but there are quite a few who have fallen well short of expectation to
this point. Frank Thomas, Gary Matthews, Travis Lee, Aaron Boone,
Bobby
Crosby, Magglio Ordonez, Johnny Damon all have two things in
common. The first is that historically they all get off to very
slow starts: April is their worst month for offensive production.
The second thing is that they are all on my Tout Wars team. Ouch,
but only for now. But
the point is this: we're just three weeks into the season and no one
believes that those guys will continue to struggle as badly as they
have. Nor will Casey Kotchman, Khalil Greene, Jim
Edmonds, Brad Wilkerson or Aramis Ramirez continue to hit under .200
all year. Check their career trends. Almost all of those
guys who are slumping early in the season are typically
slow starters and this is just par for the course, albeit a little
extreme. Even if some current slumpers typically get off to a
fast start, there's
still no reason to panic. Very, very rarely does anyone with any
track record hit that terribly over the course of a full season.
And the converse is just as true - Brandon Phillips' will not continue
on his current pace for 300+ RBI, Nick Swisher will not come close to
hitting 72 homers
nor will Kenny Rogers or Wandy Rodriguez come within wafting distance
of winning 24 games. Stay the
course and if you are feeling bold, trade for a couple more
slow starters. Chances are that you'll get a bargain for cents on
the dollar and put your team in a better position for the rest of the
summer.