Full of Sound and Fury...
It's been a pretty busy offseason for me. I did player profiles
for
the
STATS Inc Scouting Notebook
for the third straight year, and then
added the American League player profiles for the
Fantasy Baseball
Index, as well as a couple of columns for them. But now is
the time to
get ready for the season ahead, both in real baseball for
MLB.com, and
in fantasy baseball for
Tout
Wars and Mixed Nuts. I'll begin regular columns on this
season starting next week, but I wanted to start the preseason
with thoughts on this year's biggest story so far.
For supposedly America's second favorite sport, baseball has made a lot
of news this winter. The latest was the Ranger's surprising trade
of Alex Rodriguez to the Yankees for Alfonso Soriano and a player to be
named later. The attraction from the Yankees side is obvious:
they have not had a player as good as ARod on that team since Mickey
Mantle manned centerfield for them. Considering the position he
plays, it could be argued that he's their best player since Babe
Ruth. Which makes his move from shorstop to third a bit
confusing.
Derek Jeter, as nice of a guy as he is and as down to earth as he is
and as good as he is, is not in the same conversation as Alex Rodriguez
when it comes to discussing great players. Looking at the
numbers; it's a bit like comparing Bernie Williams to Ted
Williams.
Player
ABs Hits
2b 3b HR
RBI runs OPS
BB K
SB Range ZR
Jeter
651 207
32 5
17 82
124 851 69
117 24 4.10 .818
Rodriguez 634
195 36
3 44 126
128 963 71
126 22 4.63 .863
Those are the numbers for an average year from each player. The
differences really stand out in home runs, RBI, OPS and the defensive
measures, each of which heavily favor ARod. Jeter supporters will
undoubtedly cite the four championships they have won with Jeter at
shortstop, but the Yankees have not won a World Series in either of
their last two tries, so if Jeter was the driving force behind their
championship run, he hasn't been driving much recently. Those
championships certainly couldn't have been due to the fact that the
Yankees have had guys like Roger Clemens, David Cone, David Wells,
Jimmy Key and Mariano Rivera pitching for them, could they? Or
that they had better than league average production at every position
on the field the last 10 years? No, as Mars Blackmon might say,
"it's gotta be da shortstop".
There are two points to be made that have apparently escaped much of
the attention of the media. The first is that Rodriguez will be
playing a new position, and unlike shortstop, it's a reaction
position. Many good shortstops have been moved to third and
struggled. There's no guarantee that ARod will thrive there as he
has at short. It's quite possible, although somewhat unlikely,
that moving Rodriguez will give the Yankees two poor fielders on the
left side of the infield. Moving Jeter to third would make more
sense because he really doesn't have the range for short anyway: he
hasn't topped 4.00 range factor since 2000 and his zone rating has been
below .800 in two of the last three years. He was last among
regular major league shortstops in range last year. In short,
he's a lousy
fielder at short. For a team that will be depending on two
extreme groundball pitchers - Kevin Brown and Jon Lieber - to continue
their success, moving an excellent shortstop to accomodate a lousy one
seems like an extremely uninformed decision. If they kept
Rodriguez at short, at least they'd have a chance that some of the
groundballs would be caught.
The second point to be made is that unless the Yankees somehow trade
for a good second baseman, they are going to have some pretty ugly
options in their line-up. Enrique Wilson, Miguel Cairo, Homer
Bush will be the main candidates for second base now that Soriano is
gone. Wilson has a career .654 OPS and has hit below .230 for the
last three years. Cairo's career OPS is .678. The best of
the bunch is Bush, who was out of baseball due to a hip injury last
year and his career OPS is .685. So even with the addition of
ARod, how much better are the Yanks than they were? Soriano is
not a terrible player and certainly better than the dreck they will
have playing his old position. The Yankees would have had Tyler
Houston (.735 OPS) or Mike Lamb (.721) or some late-signed free agent
third baseman, plus
Soriano (.824). Now they have ARod (.953) plus the Dreck du Jour
(.675-ish OPS). There's not really that much added on offense as
a whole and it's somewhat questionable what they add on defense, if
anything.
But that's not the most confusing part of this trade. What in the
world are the Rangers thinking? Forget the nonsense about adding
payroll flexibility. Not only is it not true that ARod's contract
is the reason they couldn't get any pitching -
just look at all the other
bad contracts the Rangers have added in recent years and you'll
find close to $50 million is wasted money, which is almost enough to
buy the entire roster of the Oakland A's ($50.26 million last year) -
but now that he's gone, what will they do with the savings? For
one, they need a shortstop and they don't have anyone who can play the
position competently. Michael Young is a second baseman who has a
grand total of 18 games at short under his belt. Ramon Nivar
played it well enough in the minors that the Rangers moved him to the
outfield. Who did the Rangers have playing short in the
minors? Manny Alexander (AAA) and Marshall McDougall (AA): a
journeyman shortstop and a college second baseman.
It's true that Soriano came up as a shortstop, and might be the Rangers
best option at the position but they want to move him to center
field. OK, the Rangers already had Kevin Mench, Ramon Nivar,
Jayson Nix, Brian Jordan, David Delluci and Jason Tyner battling for
playing time in the outfield. Now they want to add another to the
mix. Not that Nivar, Dellucci or Tyner would have won a starting
job, but now they have four guys deserving of a full time job in the
outfield and no one capable of handling the most important defensive
position in the infield.
So, in addition to paying Rodriguez an average of $9.57 million a year
not to play for them (they agreed
to pay $67 million of the $179 million he's owed), the Rangers have to
spend more money to get a competent shortstop. Nevermind that all
their other positions are competently filled so the only other place
they can add offense is at catcher, which means they either trade for
an $8-10 million catcher, or take a hit on offense. So how much
of the $25 million per year they were paying ARod will they really have
to spend on "much needed" pitching?
Given that an average starting shortstop makes around $3 million per
year (Jeter, Garciaparra, Tejada and ARod skew the average even
higher), they get about $13 million to spend on pitching. But
that's assuming that their gain in pitching offsets their loss on
offense (a very big assumption). If they want to be better, they
need to address the drop-off in offense, so they'll have to spend
another $8 million or so to upgrade either short or catcher or
both. Then figure in that Soriano is due to make over $5 million
this year and more over the next two years. Did I mention that in
Soriano the Rangers got a player who is the same age as the
player they traded away? So what we have is nearly $10 million
paid to ARod to play for someone else, $5+ million for Soriano, and
probably $2-3 million for a stopgap shortstop. That leaves about
$8 million for either pitching, or an upgrade to catcher and/or
shortstop to make up for the lost offense.
In short, they break even financially on the deal
and screw up the continuity of the
team, creating a hole in the infield, further clogging a clogged
outfield situation, leaving them both grasping for replacements
and pitching help. And they
say they are better for it. Is it possible that the Rangers made
a trade that not only makes no financial sense, but also makes no
baseball sense either? Yes, please continue to watch for the
Rangers at the bottom of the AL West standings for the forseeable
future.
The only "winner" in this situation appears to be agent Scott Boras,
who has become as powerful as an owner by engineering this deal.
He took a player who was under contract and managed to convince two
teams that the player had to be traded and that his client shouldn't
take any cut in salary to move to a potentially more profitable
situation. In essense, he made ARod a free agent while he was
still under contract. If an owner did that, he would be punished
for tampering. Boras does it, and will likely reap more clients
who want him to do the same for them.
No, not even Alex Rodriguez wins in this because 1) the Yankees must
win the championship to justify his finagling, and 2) whereas he was a
virtual lock to become universally recognized as the best shortstop
ever and one of the top 2 or 3 players in history, he now has to
somehow play second fiddle to an inferior player for the next seven
years. It's true that ARod's chances of winning are better this
year in a Yankee uniform than they were in Texas, but down the road
that might not be true.
Texas already had a pretty good stable of young hitters - Teixeira,
Blalock, Young, Nix, Mench - and has some decent young arms in the
wings. With ARod solidifying the infield defense and the middle
of the line-up, they could have become a competitve force in the AL
West as soon as next year. Now, they have too many question
marks. Yes, one great player can have that kind of an
impact.
The Yankees have serious questions on defense as they now have zero
players in the field who are actually above average defenders, assuming
that ARod becomes only an average third baseman. If he manages to
excel, he will be the Yankees only plus starting defender. The
offense will be slightly better than last year, but that's assuming
that Sheffield and Giambi can stay healthy. In the years to come,
that proposition will become more and more iffy given their injury
history. The Yanks also have little or nothing on the farm after
their acquisition spree so the future, along with a $200+ million
payroll, is definitely now. It's possible if they don't win it
all this year, as great a player as he is, ARod will be remembered not
for what he did on the field, but for what he did off it and for what
he failed to do on it.